By Jim Lefevere
I have talked in the past how health care and technology is the 10 year trend. I won’t retell that story, but you can see my thoughts here. It is truly a topic where the reach consistently exceeds the grasp.
Technology once again plays a big role in the Obama health care reform plan with the multi-faceted goals of modernizing the system to lower cost and improve quality while also working to improve prevention and management of chronic diseases which (by many estimates) accounts for 80 percent of total costs. These are very lofty goals.
Technology plays a vital role in driving efficiency across the entire continuum of care. The major players driving this “reform” are many and including your usual suspects of government, corporations, policymakers and the requisite lobbyists and special interest groups.
It seems hard to fathom that something so large and unwieldy could bring about an immediate and lasting change that led to consumers getting better care faster.
The fact is that despite best intentions, untold sums of money will be spent to put a band-aid on an axe wound. The pace of change required to make a difference doesn’t happen organically and despite best efforts to move an immovable mass it will only happen as quickly as the fastest mover; the government is not known for being quick. I think it will continue to occur in fits and starts and not be the solution that it could be for a number of years. And by solution I mean a true end-to-end process that is best described here.
With that as a backdrop, as I survey the scene from high atop the hill (the figurative hill not the literal Hill in D.C.), I see a void so large that you could drive a truck through it regarding where I think real change is occurring and will continue to come from.
Revolutions Always Have Beginnings
A revolution is not about you, it’s about the collective. The hallmarks of a revolution are a few daring individuals who are angry about how things have come to be and challenge the status quo and create a cause or culture with like minded individuals. Typically very intellectually thirsty, these individuals have strong convictions and question the current status. They connect with others and commit to making a change. The model for a revolution can be seen over and over again in history and I think we’re in the beginning stages of a healthcare revolution that could uproot and change the current health care delivery model.
The Shift
The missing part for me in all of machinations of these huge grinding gears and sausage making in the current health care system is the patient. The Internet and social media, which by now we are all familiar with, is having a seismic change on how people interact, share information and connect with each other. Social media has enabled the consumer to have a voice and demand two-way dialogue and this is a change that is happening everywhere.
I am confident that real change is happening and will continue to come from the consumers who are empowered and are talking and sharing and that no company, insurer or doctor has direct influence over more than is absolutely necessary to either write the prescription or pay the bill. Common bonds and information is spreading and building entire networks of people, who are banding together across all conditions and disease states to share, learn and support each other in their health. The internet allows that connection and it is real, powerful, empowering and often more informative than any doctor can provide in a 10 minute visit.
The leaders of this new revolution are you, me and your neighbor.
The Internet and social media is leading a form of health management self-service that is still small today by most standards but will grow to be a large and a very disruptive force. There is an official term for this and it is called Health 2.0.
Healthcare whereby patients have the information they need to be able to make rational healthcare decisions (transparency of information) based on value (outcomes over price). In the Health 2.0 paradigm, everyone in the healthcare process is focused on increasing value for the patient.
We will move more into the semantic web and this consumer led movement clears the way for collaborative groups to join together through enabling technologies to find, share and combine information. The notion of the wisdom of crowds and crowd sourcing are concepts that have yet to really take off in health care, but combine the idea of the semantic web and crowd sourcing and you have the beginnings of a grassroots-led populace as a driving force that can have an impact on managing health and more specifically a disease or condition.
Forrester Research analyst Jeremiah Owyang has written about the future of the social web and talks about the 5 different eras of social media.
The Five Eras of the Social Web:
1) Era of Social Relationships: People connect to others and share
2) Era of Social Functionality: Social networks become like operating system
3) Era of Social Colonization: Every experience can now be social
4) Era of Social Context: Personalized and accurate content
5) Era of Social Commerce: Communities define future products and services
The change that I foresee, which will have the most impact on health care is that of colonization and context. Where the collective is bonded together by enabling technologies, theme, cause or condition and they find, share and combine information to support each other without the need or aid of an institution.
I think this type of social functionality and social commerce will have far-reaching impact on the health care industry. The current reform and policy work is forcing function and is really an acknowledgement of a long standing problem that translates technology into process efficiency — wringing waste from the system. However, it doesn’t look like it will have a measurable impact on improving care.
Instead, companies will have to begin to face up to the fact that the era of “consumers” simply consuming what they create is nearly over. The tables have turned and companies will begin to deliver what you the consumer actually want and need. This is of course already happening and has been going on for quite some time in software development and other industries. In doing so, I think it will begin to apply to how people self-diagnose, treat, and use information to manage their health and condition; the products they choose, down to how, when and why they see a doctor.
Amy Tenderich of Diabetes Mine is on the leading edge of this in her role as a leading Health 2.0 expert and Patient Opinion Leader for the diabetes community. The community and those on the periphery look to her and respect what she has to say. In some cases, I believe that she is more trusted to her readers than a doctor. She also recognized very early on in the Health 2.0 movement and that she could have a voice and an impact. She started a design contest that has created energy and movement in the diabetes blogosphere while also bringing good consumer product design to medical devices.
The Outcome
Take this idea a step further along with an increasingly evident power shift from organizations to individuals and subsequently communities and the scenario that I see developing is an energized group of people with a particular condition or affinity inflicting real change at a grassroots level. Combine the need for personalization, Health 2.0 advocacy, the semantic web and enabling technologies such Open Social, Google Friend Connect and Facebook Connect and crowd sourcing capabilities and it is easily within sight that communities can and will collectively develop ideas, use cases, preferred specifications and even designs that would serve as next generation products that would meet the exact needs of the communities.
The next step is this community coming together as a powerful semantic disease condition co-op and using their collective influence, power and force.
How could this manifest itself? I see a few simple ways:
* Develop and license community designed “product” to a company and use that company as a manufacturing arm for the product they designed. The company gets a licensing fee and the community gets a royalty of the sales that goes back to participating members.
* Development of a Non-Governmental Organization NGO such to sponsor, lobby and develop mechanisms to conduct independent research outside of institutions for cures to common chronic diseases, subsidizing care and cause related efforts.
* New interoperable and social application development to manage health and chronic disease.
* Set pricing for products and services.
* It’s the ultimate opportunity cost situation. What will manufacturers have to give up in order to gain?
What will the impact be to providers and payors? I think there are some questions that don’t yet have answers, but I do think there is significant interest to preserve the system in place, but I also think this could be the revolution where the institutions will have to adapt to the groundswell rather than the consumer adapting to the institution. Or, in the least, there will have to be some middle ground found to equalize the current system and satisfy the collective. People really don’t like insurance companies.
When I think of Connected Health, the above scenario is what I think of, which leaves the groups in the “reform” debate today, well, not very connected.
Jim Lefevere is a global marketing and technology professional in consumer goods, health care, and medical devices. Recently named one of the Top Forty business professionals under 40 by the Indianapolis Business Journal, he has led marketing efforts for Fortune 100 organizations and fast-growth start-ups. The thoughts expressed here do not necessarily reflect the thoughts of his employer or associations. You can read his blog on digital strategy, interactive marketing, and connected health care at http://www.jlefevere.com.
***A big hat tip to Jeremiah Oywang who provided the insight from the Future of the Social Web for me to piece together my thoughts on the groundswell I think will be coming with consumer health care.
August 11th, 2009 at 4:36 pm
Wow! What a great article. We completely support the Health 2.0 (and soon health 3.0 trends), where patients actively engage in taking control of their health.
Here at RememberItNow! we provide a simple to use online health service that includes medication reminders and a private care community. It gives caregivers peace of mind, improves patient health and reduces health care costs.
Users who have RememberItNow! can:
*Set up medication and event reminders sent via email or text message (reminders are not an extra charge), they are received under the user’s current text messaging plan.
*Create a private care community to enable care coordination, long-distance care giving, and more.
*Simplify health care with more health tools like a health journal, health statistics charts, website bookmarks, calendar sharing, medication reports and contact management.
We hope our service helps users take control of their health or the health care of someone they love.
Watch our story here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7tFYe-0hKYY
For more information visit us here: http://www.rememberitnow.com/
Interested in a Beta Invitation? Email: Abettencourt@rememberitnow.com
Thanks and we hope to hear from you soon and that you actively invest in your health!
Alex Bettencourt
August 12th, 2009 at 4:01 am
[...] This post was Twitted by Bart [...]
August 12th, 2009 at 6:16 am
Alex,
Thanks for the comment.
Jim
August 12th, 2009 at 12:30 pm
” * Develop and license community designed “product” to a company and use that company as a manufacturing arm for the product they designed. The company gets a licensing fee and the community gets a royalty of the sales that goes back to participating members. ”
This is a very top-down approach. Instead of concentrating on what “can” be created, you’ll be asking medical device employees to spend hundreds, possibly thousands, of hours looking through medical device creations submitted by consumers’ imaginations. I believe that on a social level, this idea could work. e.g. Consumers telling medical companies HOW they want them to take a larger role in social interaction, but on a physical medical device side, I don’t foresee this being an effective solution. Even on a social side, most consumer’s don’t even know what they want exactly and asking everyone could cause total disarray.
” * It’s the ultimate opportunity cost situation. What will manufacturers have to give up in order to gain?”
I don’t think manufacturers will have to give up too much, especially not monetarily. The main driver for new medical creations coming from the patient is not $$ but for the patient to live an easier, happier life. The $10k reward offered by DiabetesMine definitely helped with publicity but I believe there would be just as many entries if the reward was $1,000. Perhaps users wouldn’t have spent so much time on multimedia creations, instead opting for text based descriptions, but the driver was the opportunity for the individual who usually doesn’t have a voice to use this platform and offer solutions. If professionals submit their creations, they are likely planning on inventing this anyway. After all, the rewards from successfully bringing a product to market far outweigh $10k (See: John McCain futily proposes $300 million to company who invents better electric car battery.)
What manufacturers should do is make a similar platform that allows users to exchange ideas and offer feedback on new technology the company will be coming out with, and utilize social media like Facebook, Twitter, and Mobile Apps to do this. Here are my ideas:
1) Large Pharma is trying to get into social media…what better way to do it then making a web and mobile platform intended for consumers to congregate and discuss specific devices and programs the company will be offering? An organized conversation (company shows a product and ask a specific question, users start talking) is more effective that letting consumers roam and this company will show how forward thinking they are and how they listen.
2) Company Savings – In many ways they’ll be laying the foundation to save substantially by reducing the need for traditional focus groups.
2.5) Offer small donations to charities like the JDRF, etc. for responses.
I think we’re saying a lot of the same things, however I believe that it needs to be organized and controlled in order to be effective. Present new and exciting products to consumers, encourage comments and feedback, and have real people converse with the groups is a more productive way to go about it than opening the flood gates.
Pharma might say: But we’re allowing our competitors to see feedback on specific products which they can then analyze and use for free!
My response: Social media is to build your brand and to show consumers that you are SINCERELY trying to help and understand them. The positive branding for your company will far outweigh these “secrets” concerns, and if you’re not ready to provide an open platform because you’re afraid your competitors will be listening, then you aren’t ready to dive into social media at all.
August 12th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Thanks for the comments, Matt. Very thoughtful and comprehensive.
It’s easy to make predictions without timeframes and I should have included some to provide context to my post. This is definitely 3-5 years out and goes beyond the timing you’ve laid out above, which I agree with.
There are variables (technology) and my hypothesis is dependent on strong, loosely organized and passionate networks and communities. The beginnings of this are in place and its anything but top down. It should be interesting to see how it all pans out.
August 13th, 2009 at 7:22 am
[...] The health uprising: A revolution is coming (mobihealthnews) [...]
August 13th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Curetogether and Patientslikeme are good examples of the power of crowdsourcing health information. Pharmaceutical companies are now realizing the importance of these crowdsourced communities and its implications on trials. Theyre fast becoming a resource for cheap, efficient, and reliable research.
August 13th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
Jim- Fantastic article, you really nailed it.
The person/ patient is at the centre, and we have the technology and ability for this to be so. It also means that the traditional drivers in healthcare that are based more so on a disease model can change and move towards a health care model.
Thanks again
August 16th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Chris, thanks for the comments.
Jim
August 17th, 2009 at 6:56 am
Excellent analysis and writing. The patient should be the focus of healthcare with doctors, insurance companies, pharma (and health tech companies) competing to offer services. Throw in a social media to foster a community around all this and we have a way to promote health in the US.
August 18th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Khuert:
Thanks for the comment.