Jawbone launches Fitbit-like UP wristband

By: Chris Gullo | Nov 4, 2011        

Tags: | | | | | | |  |

jawbone-up-lowres-001Bluetooth headset maker Jawbone released Jawbone UP this week, a continuously-worn wristband sensor that tracks daily activity and sleep patterns. The device retails for $99.99 and is available starting November 6 at retailers including Target, Apple Stores, and Best Buy.

The UP band’s sensors track steps walked, pace, calories burned, and active versus inactive time. Its sleep sensor tracks phases of sleep, hours slept, overall sleep quality, and includes a smart alarm, which are most but not all of the metrics tracked by the best known sleep management device, Zeo.

“As the global health crisis mounted, we felt a strong sense of responsibility to see if we could leverage our resources, talents, and ecosystem to try and help make a difference,” stated Hosain Rahman, Jawbone founder and CEO, in a press release. “UP is Jawbone’s first step in giving people tools to become engaged as consumers of their own health. It’s a complete system designed to integrate seamlessly into one’s total lifestyle, 24 hours a day, not just the few times a week people may work out.”

The collected data integrates with the UP App, a free download for iOS devices, which shows the user’s daily sleep and activity data, and includes a “Lifeline” that maps the data across a timeline. The app’s “food activity” metric is based on photos the user snaps of their meals. The app also locates where the user is eating and asks how the food affected them to tracks patterns in eating habits over time. The food feature sounds vaguely similar to Massive Health’s The Eatery app, which launched at the beginning of this week.

When the UP band was announced this summer, Rahman said that “it seems like a big departure [for the company], but once we start talking about the things it takes to make this whole category work, we get into things like making it tiny, having a long battery life, making it fashionable, making it waterproof, working with smart phones, having a rich, visual experience on your smart phone and making it social.”

Those social aspects include a team community feature, where members join teams of friends to motivate or compete against other teams, seeing their activity in a ‘news feed’ within the app, and health challenges. Health challenges can be competitive or collaborative and can be created by users or taken from health professionals and organizations, including DailyFeats, Healthier Generation, 24 Hour Fitness, and GE Healthyimagination.

“We think the magnitude of this health epidemic requires an entire community to affect real change and we are delighted to partner with leading innovators. There are so many great folks working on so many great ideas that we created our system as an open platform enabling health experts to connect with individuals in fun, engaging ways that have never been possible before,” continued Rahman. “We want users to find programs and challenges created by experts that are just right for them.”

Jawbone’s UP has a number of competitors, including BodyMedia, Basis, Nike+, and DirectLife. Based on the details provided in the launch release, it seems it’s most similar competitor is Fitbit, which offers much of the same functionality and tracks similar metrics.

The UP band is available November 6th for $99.99 in seven colors (Dark Black, Dark Brown, Dark Red, Bright White, Bright Silver, Bright Red, Bright Blue) and in small, medium, and large sizes.

Want to read stories as soon as they are posted? Follow MobiHealthNews on Facebook.
On Twitter? Be sure to follow MobiHealthNews for up-to-the-minute news and industry analysis.

Read the press release below. Keep reading>>


Lessons learned about effective health apps

By: Brian Dolan | Nov 3, 2011        

Tags: | | | |  |

iPad medicalWhat makes a health app effective? How should we determine an app’s efficacy or effectiveness? While these have long been questions put forth in mobile health discussions, answers have finally become more substantial.

Join MobiHealthNews and two other healthcare industry thought leaders for a complimentary webinar focused on the world of health and medical apps. We will present exclusive findings from our recent apps reports, which include an analysis of health and fitness apps published during the past three years.

What does the world of health-related apps look like today? How do the most effective health apps engaging users? Which apps have failed to get traction? Why? We’ll explore these questions and many more.

We’ll also hear from one leading health application developer who believes that health apps must be tethered to the healthcare system to be effective. Mobile communication platforms and the apps that run on them now enable an entirely new approach to reaching patients beyond the walls of a hospital or clinic. These emerging apps connect with legacy networks and systems to provide entirely new approaches to keeping people well at very low costs.

Bring your questions for a lively Q&A period to follow the presentations. Tune in Thursday, November 17th at 2PM EDT. Complimentary Registration Here!

No, health sensing clothes aren’t heading to AT&T stores

By: Brian Dolan | Nov 3, 2011        

Tags: | | |  |

Brian Dolan, Editor, MobiHealthNewsLast Friday Forbes wrote that AT&T Stores plan to start selling “clothes that track the wearer’s heart rate, body temperature and other vital signs” similar to the health monitoring clothing that the NFL used to evaluate potential players earlier this year. While it may be true that AT&T may have plans to — some day — add cellular connectivity to clothes for health tracking clothing, the mobile operator told MobiHealthNews that it has no plans to sell them in its stores.

In June AT&T announced that it was working to embed cellular connectivity in Zephyr Technology’s physiological Bioharness monitor device, which currently offers Bluetooth connectivity, but as of today a cellular-enabled version of the monitor is not yet available. Zephyr worked with Under Armour to create the E39 health sensing shirts that the Forbes article refers to, but those aren’t cellular enabled yet either — also Bluetooth.

The Forbes article was based on an interview with Glenn Lurie, who is president of AT&T’s Emerging Devices division. Lurie seemed to be speculating about future devices the carrier may support — perhaps some were in the near term — and  Forbes characterized health sensing clothes as the devices that were “next up” for AT&T sales channels.

“I can see where the Forbes piece is a bit confusing,” an AT&T spokesperson told MobiHealthNews in an email. “Glenn’s point was that we are looking at all kinds of opportunities, including clothing that offers trackable technology. We are not saying we’ll be selling this in our stores (though that’s easy to infer from [Forbes writer Elizabeth] Woyke’s language), rather, we will be looking to sell connections for these devices.”

Unfortunately, the story that spread from the Forbes article was just the opposite. Headlines from other publications that picked up the story: “AT&T plans to sell clothes that track your vital signs wirelessly.” “AT&T to sell connected clothing.” “AT&T to Begin Selling Clothing with Embedded Wireless Health Sensors.” “AT&T diversifies portfolio with E39 shirt.” There’s more and they are all untrue.

My favorite reference to this story came from a post over at the New York Times blog this morning. In a story called “Could ‘Smart’ Textiles Prove Toxic?” the NYTimes wrote: “Asked about the potential recycling of AT&T’s ‘bio-tracking clothes,’ a company spokeswoman, Dawn Benton, wrote, ‘At this point in time we don’t have a comment or insight on this topic.’”

That’s probably because no such clothes exist yet.

Might AT&T stores one day sell cellular-enabled clothing? Perhaps. It’s definitely not the type of device that’s “next up” for AT&T Store shelves though.

Want to read stories as soon as they are posted? Follow MobiHealthNews on Facebook.
On Twitter? Be sure to follow MobiHealthNews for up-to-the-minute news and industry analysis.

CHIME focus group shows fine line between security and usability

By: Neil Versel | Nov 3, 2011        

Tags: | | | | | | | |  |

Neil VerselYou know something has caught on in health IT when healthcare CIOs start talking about it. And when vendors are willing to shell out big bucks to hear hospital-based IT administrators share their opinions on it. By that measure, mobile access to hospital networks is very much a mainstream idea now.

I come to this conclusion after sitting in on a Compuware focus group with a baker’s dozen of CIOs at last week’s College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME) Fall CIO Forum.

Compuware executives convened the panel to help them make R&D investment decisions in healthcare, based on three areas of discussion: how CIOs are addressing the mobile user experience; what poor user experience costs health systems in terms of lost productivity and low adoption rates; and what CIOs consider important elements of user “dashboards” on both fixed and mobile devices.

This was just the second year CHIME allowed media to observe the previously off-limits focus groups, and not all vendors consented. Journalists like myself were bound by strict rules. We could report on the general concepts discussed, but specifics about technology and the CIOs’ opinions were strictly off the record. Nor were we allowed to identify or directly quote individual participants unless they were willing to talk one-on-one after the session.

The idea is that vendors spend a lot of money for 90-minute blocks of time with health IT leaders so they can have frank discussions about strategic concepts, many of which are still be considered confidential. Having reporters around kind of defeats that purpose, unless we’re given a gag order in advance. (If you want something to be off the record, tell me up front. Otherwise, it’s fair game.)

So, what did I find? CIOs are having a lot of growing pains with mobility. No surprise there. Unlike pretty much every other form of technology in a hospital, lots of mobile devices network administrators are being asked to support actually belong to the users. Employees and medical staff are bringing in their own smartphones and tablets, then demanding on-the-go access to institutional systems.

As the Compuware discussion noted, clinicians expect a “Google experience” out of EHRs, meaning a fast response. But network capacity, particularly of the wireless variety, is being stretched, lessening the user experience. This leads to reduced clinician productivity, lower satisfaction and, ultimately, resistance to EHR adoption and lower “meaningful use” bonus payments.

“We’re hearing that there’s a gap in service because [smartphones and tablets] are personal devices,” Michael Wilson, senior IT director for clinical services at Compuware, told me at the end of the session. And Detroit-based Compuware is sharpening its healthcare focus around application performance, or what the company calls “end-user experience management.”

The general consensus in the focus group was that mobile devices don’t quite deliver the optimal user experience. For example, physicians are often inconvenienced by the iTunes App store. Last month, millions of iPhone and iPad owners had to reinstall all of their apps after downloading the new Apple iOS version 5. In healthcare settings, guess who all the docs turned to for tech support?

(The desire among CIOs to get a better handle on app management has been driving the nascent trend of private healthcare app stores.)

Some CIOs also complained that health IT vendors might be working a bit too hard to produce software in native mobile format that they neglect security. With tighter HIPAA restrictions and increased penalties for breaches since the HITECH Act in 2009, this could be a fatal flaw. But it’s vital information for companies to have as they walk the delicate line between security and usability. Those who strike the right balance will be richly rewarded.

Want to read stories as soon as they are posted? Follow MobiHealthNews on Facebook.
On Twitter? Be sure to follow MobiHealthNews for up-to-the-minute news and industry analysis.

Steve Jobs: iCloud may even store medical data

By: Brian Dolan | Nov 3, 2011        

Tags: | | | | | |  |

MIM VueMe AppAs has been well documented here and elsewhere, Apple’s devices have seen impressive adoption among healthcare professionals. iPhones, iPods, and iPads have — along with other mobile devices — served as useful mobile platforms for health-related apps and services for general consumers, too.

Recently, in the days following the memorial service for Apple founder Steve Jobs and the publication of his biography, a handful of fleeting references to Jobs’ views on the future of medicine have emerged along with a glimpse if his vision for Apple’s role in it.

One of the passages in Walter Isaacson’s recently published biography of Steve Jobs quotes the former CEO as envisioning Apple’s iCloud as a place where people might store their medical data:

“We need to be the company that manages your relationship with the cloud—streams your music and videos from the cloud, stores your pictures and information, and maybe even your medical data,” Jobs told Isaacson. “Apple was the first to have the insight about your computer becoming a digital hub. So we wrote all of these apps—iPhoto, iMovie, iTunes—and tied in our devices, like the iPod and iPhone and iPad, and it’s worked brilliantly. But over the next few years, the hub is going to move from your computer into the cloud. So it’s the same digital hub strategy, but the hub’s in a different place. It means you will always have access to your content and you won’t have to sync.”

Jobs’ sister, the exceptionally eloquent author Mona Simpson, said in her eulogy for her brother that Jobs sketched re-designs for various things found in his room at the ICU.

“Intubated, when he couldn’t talk, he asked for a notepad,” Simpson said. “He sketched devices to hold an iPad in a hospital bed. He designed new fluid monitors and x-ray equipment. He redrew that not-quite-special-enough hospital unit. And every time his wife walked into the room, I watched his smile remake itself on his face.”

Isaacson quotes Jobs comparing the current opportunity for new innovations in medicine to the time period back when he first began working in personal computers. Jobs said his son had taken an interest in medical research:

“One of the very few silver linings about me getting sick is that Reed’s gotten to spend a lot of time studying with some very good doctors,” Jobs said. “His enthusiasm for it is exactly how I felt about computers when I was his age. I think the biggest innovations of the twenty-first century will be the intersection of biology and technology. A new era is beginning, just like the digital one was when I was his age.”

Want to read stories as soon as they are posted? Follow MobiHealthNews on Facebook.
On Twitter? Be sure to follow MobiHealthNews for up-to-the-minute news and industry analysis.

Pew: Health app adoption same as last year

By: Brian Dolan | Nov 3, 2011        

Tags: | |  |

Pew Health Apps AdoptionFor more than a year now the Pew Research Centers’s Internet & American Life Project has been tracking the adoption of health apps by adults in the US. In September 2010 Pew found that about 9 percent of all adult mobile phone users in the US had downloaded an app that “helped them track or manage their health.” In its most recent survey in August 2011 Pew found that about 11 percent of all adult cell phone users having downloaded an app that helps them manage their health. While that is a slight increase over last year’s number, Pew characterized it as “a statistically insignificant difference.” App adoption, therefore, has been largely stagnant over the past 12 months.

Pew writes that “health apps” include those that capture “a wide range of software applications, from those that count calories and help manage an exercise routine, to more advanced apps that monitor vital signs and help individuals manage serious health conditions.”

The survey conducted this past August, however, was conducted a bit differently: “In August 2011, the question was asked of adults who have downloaded an app to a cell phone or tablet computer, rather than all cell phone users. More than a quarter of this population (29 percent) report downloading a health app. Looking just at adults who download apps to a cell phone, this translates to 11 percent of all adult cell phone users having downloaded an app that helps them manage their health, a statistically insignificant difference from the 9 percent of adult cell users who reported having a mobile health app in September 2010,” Pew writes.

Pew also found that the new survey results show little change among health app adoption rates among different racial/ethnic groups.

Be sure to check out Pew’s entire report, which focuses on overall cell phone and apps adoption — not just for health. Full report freely available here.
If you’d like to learn more about health apps, be sure to register for MobiHealthNews’ webinar: What Makes A Health App Effective? (Complimentary Registration Here)